On 10/7/11 11:18 AM, "ext Yves Bailly" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Le 07/10/2011 10:48, [email protected] a écrit : >> On 10/7/11 10:26 AM, "ext Yves Bailly"<[email protected]> wrote: >> [...] >>> Is QML suited in such cases? >> >> It's most likely better suited for the task then QWidgets. Only problem >> could be if you need some functionality that we don't support in QML >>yet. > >Well, I need pretty everything QWidget-based classes provide, and a bit >more... >Combos, stacks and tabs, lists, tables and trees (model-based or not, >some items >may be full widgets), splitters, groups, some delegates here and there... >even a >checkbox or a label sometimes ;-) Not talking about layouts of course. >All of this being build and filled dynamically at runtime. > >Now if QML is said to be better suited for such cases, then maybe I >should find >some hours (days?) to really learn it. Well, right now some of the functionality that you mention above is still missing. We'll get there eventually. But it is most likely easier to create a UI dynamically than with QWidgets. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
