Vadim Godunko wrote: > > Only one question, is it mandatory that descendants be dynamically > allocated? > The dynamic allocation of the QObject subclasses is most useful and safe strategy. It is possible to allocate their statically, but this has different from C++ semantic, and may be the reason of some runtime problems (accessibility level checks failures for example).
> By the way wasn't it possible to manage for Q_Object being a controlled > type? This would have avoided having to forcing user to initialize. > Yes, I am that lazy. :-) > Unfortunately, no. This is because most QObject subclasses don't have default constructors. _______________________________________________ qtada-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qtada.com/mailman/listinfo/qtada-users_lists.qtada.com
