Rajagopalan Srinivasan wrote: > Unless I am looking at the wrong place, it appears that the bindings to > QTableWidget could be more complete > > In particular I am missing the following and similar ones. If they are > there, would like to have a pointer to the spec. > I can recommend you to develop you own subclass from QAbstractTableModel, instead of use QTableWidget :-) Development of your own table model is relatively simple task and it give many benefits comparing to use QTableWidget.
Binding to QTableWidget is incomplete and there are no plans to extend it, because there are no (good) way to resolve memory management issues with QTableWidgetItem for now. _______________________________________________ qtada-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qtada.com/mailman/listinfo/qtada-users_lists.qtada.com
