Hello.
Please take a look at this Qt/Java comparison document.
turing.iimas.unam.mx/~elena/PDI-Lic/qt-vs-java-whitepaper.pdf
In my opinion QtAda is better to use rather then Java/Swig.
It is a fully compliant with Qt/C++.
QtAssistant documentation and QtDesigner simplifies development of QtAda
applications.
12.07.2010 17:55, [email protected] пишет:
Hi everyone,
I am very new to Qt, and have some questions regarding QtADA. I've looked
all over the internet for the last several hours, and have not been able
to find anything relevant.
Specifically, I am working on a project which uses an ADA base, and I am
trying to develop a GUI for it. I was originally looking at using Java
Swing with some basic Java bindings, but during my research I found QT. I
was wondering if anyone could point me to some sort of relevant comparison
between the two binding mechanisms?
I apologize if this is the wrong forum for posting a question like this,
but Im at a loss as to where to look next :(.
Thanks for the help,
jgraum
_______________________________________________
qtada-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://box347.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/qtada-users_lists.qtada.com
--
Best regards,
Alexander Basov.
_______________________________________________
qtada-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://box347.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/qtada-users_lists.qtada.com
