I really mean to start it unmapped. It is more off an experiment but there are valuable applications that stem from this.
Am Montag, 2. Januar 2017 17:06:51 UTC+1 schrieb Tycho Andersen: > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 01:14:35AM -0800, [email protected] > <javascript:> wrote: > > Is there a proper way to start an application not under control of > qtile? > > I don't mean retroactively changing it to Xunmapped with xdotool or so. > > > Basically I want to start an application truly hidden, without even > > blinking up for a split second. The application itself does not > support > > it so this needs to be done in the WM, I think. I would use workarounds > as > > well, if existent. > > Do you really want it not be managed? Or do you just want it to pop > up when you start it? > > You could always set a match rule to match some particular group > that you're not focused on. > > Tycho > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "qtile-dev" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qtile-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
