I opened a github discussion for anyone interested in hacking on this with 
me https://github.com/qtile/qtile/discussions/2136! I would certainly be 
incredibly appreciative if anyone can help provide guidance on this!

On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 9:48:03 AM UTC-5 Cullen Ross wrote:

> Oh! I just had a better idea! Why not extend the zoomy layout to have 
> multiple stacks? It'd get pretty complicated for more than two, but for 
> just two, having the zoomy windows on the left and right for each stack 
> would be similar to the stackline layout you linked! Combining zoomy with 
> jonaburg's fork of picom with animations (
> https://github.com/jonaburg/picom) gives a beautiful effect. 
> Unfortunately the zoomy layout has been problematic for me currently (
> https://github.com/qtile/qtile/issues/2125). Have you had any issues with 
> it?
>
> On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 8:26:08 AM UTC-5 Cullen Ross wrote:
>
>> Ooooo, wow, the stackline would be really nice! i3's method is decent, 
>> but not really my favorite. I think it conflicts with picom corner rounding(
>> https://github.com/ibhagwan/picom) the last time I tried it, although 
>> it's been a while and perhaps it's better now.
>> There is tabbed (https://tools.suckless.org/tabbed/) from the suckless 
>> folks. I'm using it on my bspwm setup and it works well. I'm not sure if it 
>> makes sense to integrate it into qtile though.
>>
>> I think I made the suggestion of doing it with the TreeTab side panel is 
>> because it looks like most of the code is  already there. I may try to 
>> create a frankenstein with snippets from slice, TreeTab, and Stack layouts, 
>> but not too sure of how it'll go.
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 5:08:17 AM UTC-5 Guillaume Gelin wrote:
>>
>>> Eh, I recently starred this repository on GitHub, and would love to see 
>>> something similar for Qtile: https://github.com/AdamWagner/stackline
>>>
>>> Another solution would be to implement bars above the windows, à la i3: 
>>> https://i3wm.org/docs/modes.png
>>>
>>> I don't have much opinion as to what we should do to propose 
>>> such a feature. I guess it will mostly depend on who is doing the PR and 
>>> how they want to implement it. :)
>>>
>>> Le mar. 19 janv. 2021 à 23:33, Cullen Ross <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was messing around with the layouts today and one of the things I 
>>>> really like about stack/columns layout is that they effectively act as a 
>>>> tabbing layout to have windows side by side but in stacks of a certain 
>>>> category. The problem I have with them is that you can only identify what 
>>>> is in the stack by either cycling through the windows or splitting the 
>>>> stack. The first is a little time-consuming and the second can behave 
>>>> poorly if you have many windows in the stack and/or the windows don't take 
>>>> kindly to size changes (e.g. libreoffice in my case). Treetab is a great 
>>>> layout, but I feel that it is limited by only having the max layout as its 
>>>> main layout. I think the combination of stack/columns and TreeTab such 
>>>> that 
>>>> there can be a number of stacks as well as a panel on the side with the 
>>>> list of names of each opened window in each stack would be fantastic. My 
>>>> guess for the simplest way to execute this would be to add an option in 
>>>> stack/columns layout to display a panel on the side for the window names, 
>>>> but alternatively the Treetab layout could supposedly use the stack/column 
>>>> layout instead of the Max layout for each sections. I guess I could try 
>>>> and 
>>>> script something in the slice layout so that the script constantly runs 
>>>> and 
>>>> provides the list of windows in each stack, but I think this would be more 
>>>> feasible to be integrated into on of the existing layouts.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "qtile-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qtile-dev/45c7b0da-2ead-4205-8a74-0fa091a7baa8n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qtile-dev/45c7b0da-2ead-4205-8a74-0fa091a7baa8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Guillaume Gelin
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qtile-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qtile-dev/04e0e127-86d1-4265-a7b9-48da457a1fa2n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to