|
Stuntman Bush has banned Federal money on The majority of stem cells I never said there was a ban on research.
My problem is his way of thinking.
For example, did you know more embryos are lost by a natural pregnancy than in vitro fertilization?
In vitro fertilization has a better success rate than natural conception so should we ban natural conception because it's killing more embryos than ivf?
This position he has is not scientific it's personal so I think I would let the scientist be the judge instead of Bush and that's not Junk science that's responsible science.
I could care less what Kerry thinks about this subject this is my opinion and I'm not voting for Kerry btw.
Mark
-------Original Message-------
Date: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:53:31 PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Political Garbage, & False Logic .... Reaction to: Communist Party Endorsement Kerry/Edwards
There is no ban on embryonic stem research.
There is no scientific proof at this time that it works better than
adult stem cells.
Do you want real science funded or "junk science".
KERRY IS LYING!
>
>
> I have a question.
> If President Bush's position on Stem Cells is based on the fact that
he
> thinks an embryo is life then why is it ok for the donor to decide if
it's
> destroyed or given to research or adopted by another clinic.
> It seems to me if an embryo is life then the parents of the embryo
should be
> held accountable for destroying it in the first place.
> This is why I have a problem with this position on embryonic stem cell
> research.
> Why is it ok for the donor to decide this isn't life but not
researchers are
> we saying that ordinary people are smarter than our best scientist?
>
> Mark
>
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: Jim Lubin
> Date: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:06:34 PM
> To: Stacy Harim; QuadPirate; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Political Garbage, & False Logic .... Reaction
to:
> Communist Party Endorsement Kerry/Edwards
>
> I think that would be false logic, if I'm understanding it correctly.
Your
> question is based on the assumption that they stay frozen forever and
never
> used for IVF at a future time.
>
> Since you bring up "live a quality life", are you saying an embryo is
life?
> If so then what gives you the right to determine it's fate?
>
> At 06:38 PM 10/11/2004, Stacy Harim wrote:
>
> So they stay frozen forever and never live a quality life?
> Stacy
>
>
>
>
--
It's not the fall that hurts.
Home page http://tnthompson0.tripod.com/homeincyberspace/
Graphics portfolio http://tnthompson1.tripod.com/index.htm
Domain space http://nw-in.com/index.html
. | 
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
