----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 5:08
PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] motion
OK,
I'm a day late.
But I usualy "react" when someone gets me started ;^P
Those who know me, know I like to debate, but I deal in facts not
"feelings".
Sorry guys, I've really tried, but I never could get in touch with my
"feminen" side.
If anybody wants to debate "a political issue" with me, we can move
it off the Quad-list.
But isn't half of what we deal with about "politics"
in one form or other?
Whose going to frame the debate?
Obviously, I'd make a poor choice.
Stunt
On 6/20/06, Danny
Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Amen to that Jim......that what I have said a few times over past
years. people have very different views on politics, some are more informed
on certain subjects than others, like I once said--before I got paralyzed, I
used to see people half kill each other in bars and parties over
POLITICS .
Dan H.
Jim Lubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll second that.
At 07:40 PM 6/19/2006, William Willis
wrote:
I make a motion we try hard to
steer clear of politics on the board. From past experience, it seems to
create dissension and hard feelings nearly every time. I see the
quad-list as a place of support and encouragement. Do I hear a
second?
