Not to make light of a serious situation, but this issue is being clouded by both facts and some. I'm easily confused by some of those "facts." W In a message dated 4/8/2007 1:04:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am against the whole IVF process that creates excess embryos to begin with. The frozen embryos can continued to be stored indefinitely. What's wrong with that? Are you concerned about the energy being used to keep them frozen? The embryos that are unfrozen eventually die a natural death, just as every other living thing, then cremated. That is quite different then killing it by removing stem cells to use in someone else. Even organ donors are declared dead by some standards before there organs are removed. # S.5—Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007 doesn't even do that; it just states that the embryos were in excess of the clinical need of the individuals seeking such treatment. and would never be implanted in a woman. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
