LMAO!
- Angie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:    Kidding?? We don't need to kid. I have neighbors 
that can't pay bills but go to every execution to protest against the people 
that think the death penalty is wrong. They protest abortions but not at the 
IVF clinic. They think life is a miracle because they don't have children. (I'm 
not telling them babies are a result of sex) That stuff is dirty and after 
meeting them, I believe them having sex would be WRONG on levels of hell nobody 
ever dreamed of. They own guns incase they need to send someone to hell or meet 
a commie. nuff said..
   
  john
  
   
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Six Stem Cell Facts

  .AOLPlainTextBody {   FONT-SIZE: 12px; MARGIN: 0px; COLOR: #000; FONT-FAMILY: 
Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff  }  
.AOLPlainTextBody PRE {   FONT-SIZE: 9pt  }  .AOLInlineAttachment {   MARGIN: 
10px  }  .AOLAttachmentHeader {   BORDER-RIGHT: #7da8d4 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 
#7da8d4 1px solid; BACKGROUND: #f9f9f9; FONT: 11px arial; BORDER-LEFT: #7da8d4 
1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #7da8d4 1px solid  }  .AOLAttachmentHeader .Title {   
PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; BACKGROUND: #b5ddfa; PADDING-BOTTOM: 
3px; FONT: 11px arial; PADDING-TOP: 3px  }  .AOLAttachmentHeader .FieldLabel {  
 PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-LEFT: 9px; BACKGROUND: #f9f9f9; PADDING-BOTTOM: 
1px; FONT: 11px arial; COLOR: #000000; PADDING-TOP: 1px  }  
.AOLAttachmentHeader .FieldValue {   BACKGROUND: #f9f9f9; FONT: 11px arial; 
COLOR: #000000  }  .AOLAttachmentHeader A {   COLOR: #2864b4; TEXT-DECORATION: 
none  }  .AOLImage A {   COLOR: #2864b4; TEXT-DECORATION: none  } 
 .AOLAttachmentHeader A:hover {   COLOR: #2864b4; TEXT-DECORATION: underline  } 
 .AOLImage A:hover {   COLOR: #2864b4; TEXT-DECORATION: underline  }  
.AOLWebSuiteCompose .AOLPicturesFullSizeLink {   OVERFLOW: hidden; WIDTH: 1px; 
HEIGHT: 1px  }  .AOLWebSuite .AOLPicturesFullSizeLink {   OVERFLOW: hidden; 
WIDTH: 1px; HEIGHT: 1px  }  BODY {   BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: 0px; 
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: "Verdana"; 
BACKGROUND-COLOR: white  }  .AOLWebSuiteCompose P {   PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; 
PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px  }  
IMG.managedImg {   WIDTH: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px  }  IMG.placeholder {   
BORDER-RIGHT: #dadad6 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #dadad6 1px solid; BACKGROUND: 
#f4f4f4 no-repeat center center; BORDER-LEFT: #dadad6 1px solid; WIDTH: 275px; 
BORDER-BOTTOM: #dadad6 1px solid; HEIGHT: 206px  }      I hope you're kidding.

Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:   Yes, yes, yes! We must not destroy all those 
useless fertilized eggs. We should let them perish on their own and then we 
should have an elaborate funeral and bury them in a tiny little plot of earth. 
AND we must not allow abortion at ANY cost. Thank you Jesus! Hallelujah! 

Dan, who always gives great credence to anything authored by a reverend. 

At 06:15 PM 4/7/2007 -0700, Jim Lubin said something that elicited my response:
  

    SIX STEM CELL FACTS

The public discussion of human embryo research has too often lacked 
intellectual honesty, which has only compounded the confusion of an issue of 
great scientific and moral complexity, say Robert P. George professor of 
jurisprudence at Princeton University and a member of the President's Council 
on Bioethics and Rev. Thomas V. Berg, executive director of the Westchester 
Institute for Ethics and the Human Person.

Consequently, there are certain facts on which people on either side of the 
moral debate should be able to agree, say George and Berg.  For example:     
   There is no "ban" on human embryonic stem cell (ESC) research in the United 
States; the federal government has funded such research to the tune of $130 
million dollars since 2001, and the United States continues to be the 
international leader in the field.   
   We are a long way away from therapies derived from embryonic stem cells; 
many leading stem cell researchers have echoed the fact that there may be no 
breakthrough any time soon.   
   Standard embryology texts insist that from the zygote (single-cell embryo) 
stage forward there exists a new living member of the species homo sapiens that 
has the active potential to develop by an internally directed process towards 
maturity. 


Also:     
   There are non-controversial alternatives worth exploring; such as the 
reprogramming of ordinary somatic (body) cells, the derivation of stem cells 
from amniotic fluid, and (assuming that it can be shown that the product is not 
an embryo), altered nuclear transfer.   
   Concerns about embryo destruction are not only religious; but merely a 
healthy respect for the human capacity for doing evil in pursuit of the good.   
   The search for cures is not the only motive behind ESC research,; many 
scientists are interested only in enhancing basic scientific knowledge of such 
things as cell signaling, tissue growth and early human development. 


Source: Robert P. George and Thomas V. Berg, "Six Stem Cell Facts," Wall Street 
Journal, March 14, 2007.

For text:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117384191108736444.html 

    
---------------------------------
  Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games. 
    
---------------------------------
  AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from 
AOL at AOL.com.




       
---------------------------------
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.

Reply via email to