Oh, yeah... "No Bias, No Bull." I forgot about that. I have to turn it down during Lou Dobbs (unless my BP is especially low that day!) and I don't always turn it back up in time.
As for embyonic stem cell research, I can't seem to put it into a context of "is it right or wrong" ... Not all science meets with everyone's definition of "ethical." But science, in this case, is using "spare" embryos that ARE going to be incinerated as "biohazardous waste" and taking a chance at putting them to good use. Some people feel genetically modified food is "unethical" and that the results of GM pollen/nectar are killing off monarch butterflies. However, we DO need food. Best wishes & Good night! --Tod ---- Quadius <quad...@gmail.com> wrote: > You were quite correct that Obama is not to be credited with this particular > approval, but I think federal money will be coming next week or shortly > thereafter. As for me, I'm keeping my fingers crossed. I know there are > others on here who don't agree with embryonic stem cell research, but I for > one am glad things are changing. > > As for me, CNN is my secondary source in my house. I usually watch MSNBC. > It's definitely more left in the evening, but I often find that I get much > more out of the shows than I do anywhere else. > > If I were to choose a CNN show I like to watch, it would be Campbell > Brown's. > Just my opinion. > Quadius > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Tod E. Santee <sant...@cox.net> wrote: > > > Hey Bob -- I *LOVE* politics! CNN is a fixture at my house, not a channel > > to choose. Wolf Blitzer's "Situation Room" is as attention-grabbing, to me, > > as porn is to many (LOL). > > > > I don't mind discussing it here. And, as a science teacher, too, I can't > > wait 'til Obama erases some of the Bush stranglehold on science being > > published without "presidential editing." > > > > Best wishes! > > --Tod > >
