Paul -
The question, in my mind, is whether or not people are contributing and
what we as a group can do to encourage that -vs- the mechanism by which
such a process can happen. I am not sure that creating a technical
panel for people to be on will actually encourage them to contribute.
Question:
Did the very act of maintainers actively soliciting input allow the
great interaction?
donald
On 6/15/15 12:46 PM, Paul Jakma wrote:
Hi,
At present everyone is encouraged to help review stuff and chip in. I
have felt for a good while that it would help encourage people to do
so and generally be good, if we had more explicit inclusion of
contributors into technical oversight of Quagga. There are many, many
good people working on Quagga, with valuable technical abilities. The
question is how do we best organise things to encourage and use them?
I'm wondering if we could try devolve technical oversight to a
tech-{panel,committee,whatever}. Anyone who has contributed to Quagga
could apply and/or be invited in, to join, subject to the panel's
approval.
E.g. a tech-{panel,committee,whatever} with responsibility for
technical oversight, to review contributions, give feedback, and
commit approval? Perhaps initially working on the traditional
consensus basis, and evolving itself to whatever way of working it
wanted.
Is that something, or ????
regards,
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
