Paul - I like this patch because it helps us solve Multi-Instance Issues we are seeing with our MI-OSPF patch. The MI patches are in the list of what I am attempting to get upstreamed.
doanld On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Paul Jakma <p...@jakma.org> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Semyon Verchenko wrote: > > add flag for fixing >> https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2015-April/012195.html >> issue -- "router ospf" appearance in vtysh running-config while it >> is not present in ospfd's config >> > > Interesting. > > Though, this makes me wonder about the previous patch and whether the > issue basically was with the 'ip ospf area' command implementation the > other person was using. > > Further, with this approach, won't that cause a problem for 'ip ospf area' > - it won't work until 'router ospf' is entered, however 'ip ospf area ...' > should cause to start of itself, surely? > > Basically, I'm wondering if perhaps the correct solution to this is to > back out the previous patch that caused the problem for you, and then just > ensure that interface commands that need an ospf instance create it? > > I.e. see the last 2 commits of: > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/quagga.git/log/?h=volatile/paul/unnumbered > > (see e.g. the comment on ospf_interface_area_set and implementation in the > last patch) > > regards, > -- > Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A > Fortune: > Grandpa Charnock's Law: > You never really learn to swear until you learn to drive. > > [I thought it was when your kids learned to drive. Ed.] >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
