On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Nov 2015, Vivek Venkatraman wrote: > > In some ways, the VRF registration mechanism that we're introducing as >> part of VRF-lite support in BGP can be viewed as a VPN manager. I envisage >> a related label management component when we move beyond VRF-lite to >> full-blown L3VPNs (or EVPNs w/ MPLS). To me, these would be part of >> 'zebra', not a separate daemon; the VRF management is definitely being >> implemented as part of zebra. >> > > Why as part of zebra? > > And "is definitely being implemented"? You proceed at your own risk to > design and implement behind closed doors first. >
I misspoke here. The basic VRF management tenets are part of the library and when I meant 'definitely being implemented' I was referring to the VRF library from 6wind that is already included in Quagga to which additions are being made which Vipin and I mentioned earlier - name-based registration primarily. > regards, > -- > Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A > Fortune: > Be careful! UGLY strikes 9 out of 10! >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
