What's form of the commands when there are no VRFs in use?
Lou
On December 23, 2015 2:28:50 PM Vipin Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks Nicolas.
So, I assume you are fine with changing zebra commands (such as this) to..
'show ip route vrf <name> A.B.C.D/M'
from its previous form..
'show ip route A.B.C.D/M vrf <name>'
Regards,
Vipin
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Nicolas Dichtel <[email protected]>
wrote:
Le 21/12/2015 22:21, Vipin Kumar a écrit :
As some of you might recall, we had converged on adding the vrf option in
BGP commands just they way it has for a view. I have made the necessary
changes and (painfully n boringly) adjusted the argument indexes. As for
the pending work, view option isn't available for all the commands, so
that
work is coming soon too.
I have a relevant question/comment:
For all the zebra commands that were modified by VRF lib, 'vrf <arg>' is
the last option there.
Wouldn't it make sense to be consistent and add vrf hierarchically around
the same location in a command?
Seems good for me.
Thank you,
Nicolas
for example:
'show ip bgp vrf <name> neighbor ..'
and
'show ip route vrf <name> A.B.C.D/M'
instead of ..
'show ip route A.B.C.D/M vrf <name>' // this is how we it in the
current VRF lib
thanks,
Vipin
----------
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
