On 24 Jan 2016, at 21:17, Alexander Turner wrote:
I really like the Gitlab and Gitlab CI option - heavy ruby app but
very
customisable and the CI agent runs on anything. We were using it to
build
against PPC cluster a while back and really liked it.
Be careful when you say it “runs on anything”. Currently I run
builds and
tests on Ubuntu 12.04, Ubuntu 14.04, Debian 8, CentOS 6, CentOS 7,
FreeBSD 8,
FreeBSD 9, FreeBSD 10, NetBSD 6, NetBSD 7, OpenBSD 5.8 and OmniOS
(Solaris) -
and I’m sure this list _WILL_ grow.
I haven’t even started to test on non-intel platforms…
Even CI systems with the “universal” Java clients fail. Neither
Atlassian’s (part
of Bamboo) or Jenkins can do this. I’m actually using for a lot of
work a local
agent on the CI system itself which executes the needed command across a
SSH
session. At lease SSH seems to run “on anything”.
But independent of this, I’ve installed a test Gitlab server and it
actually has
hooks into Atlassian Bamboo as CI system as well (and many more). My
initial
impression is that Gitlab would work fine with my CI system.
I've never really like the Atlassian suite - found it incredibly
fiddly.
Interesting. My experience is that they are extremely polished.
Sometimes a bit
less feature-rich than some bleeding edge open source community
software, but
generally much more stable.
(i.e. When I started looking for a CI system, I could not find a working
Jenkins
version. Bugs got fixed fast, but every new version had something else
essential
[for me] broken.)
Might be that you spent time with very old versions of Atlassian tools
(long time back)?
Anyway, I’m not saying Atlassian tools are better - I have not made up
my mind
yet. I really like the polished interface and the open integration to
other
tools in Gitlab, but I need to play with code reviews in the tools. That
seems to
be the main issue why we even discuss these tools.
- Martin
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Martin Winter <
[email protected]> wrote:
On 23 Jan 2016, at 8:44, Kei Nohguchi wrote:
By the way, why github is not the option? I believe we've already
talked
about it, but just curious.
I prefer something which is self-hosted. Usually more flexible to
customize and add hooks as needed (i.e. hooks into
my CI system). Not sure what other think, but my impression that at
this
time we mainly discuss choices for code
review and focus on choices which can be self-hosted
Thank you, Martin, for the info! Now, github is just a mirror.
Regarding gitlab, as Paul mentioned, gitlab can be self-hosted, or I
would say, they started as the self hosted github. :) That's what
we did
last time, as our code was closed…
https://about.gitlab.com/downloads/#ubuntu1204
That’s my understanding as well, but I have not yet started to look
into
Gitlab.
I’ve installed a Gerrit Server so far, but have not yet played very
much
with it.
On a side note: If someone wants an account on my gerrit server, then
send
me an private
email with account name(s) and if you want admin or user account (or
both
- then send me 2 account names).
The gerrit server is a PLAYGROUND. I have VM snapshots in case things
go
wrong to rollback and
I will delete the server at the end - so don’t use it for anything
real.
(PS: I’m giving a talk about the challenges on testing Quagga at
the
Netdevconf in Sevilla at the beginning
of february)
I wish I can be there. Do you think that will be recorded and
posted
somewhere so that I can watch?
I assume - most conferences I go have talks online afterwards, but
I’ll
post at least the
paper & slides afterwards on our web server.
- Martin
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
