Probably not intentional. It's a bit complicated to properly hookup code, especially since the implementors may not use vtysh.
A patch would be accepted. donald On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > My question is about "no interface" command in vtysh. > It is defined as follows: > > /* TODO Implement "no interface command in isisd. */; > DEFSH (VTYSH_ZEBRA|VTYSH_RIPD|VTYSH_RIPNGD|VTYSH_OSPFD|VTYSH_OSPF6D, > vtysh_no_interface_cmd, > "no interface IFNAME", > NO_STR > "Delete a pseudo interface's configuration\n" > "Interface's name\n") > > It means that command is not sent to isisd (it also mentioned in TODO) and > pimd. > > But: > Support for "no interface" command was added to isisd in the > commit e38e0df0 ( > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/quagga.git/commit?id=e38e0df01ad305ad48ecf816b52fa99fd3f2a4e1 > ). > Support for "no interface" command was in pimd from the initial commit - > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/quagga.git/commit?id=871dbcfede60a8d2d286728bcbd88f27c2035b87 > . > > So the question is - is this intentional or isisd and pimd should be added > to the list of daemons for "no interface" command? > > Best regards, > Igor > > _______________________________________________ > Quagga-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
