On Nov 1, 2017, at 7:59 AM, Mark Coetser <m...@tux-edo.co.za> wrote: > OK i have a working ospf setup between multiple routers including some > mikrotiks. OSPF works fine but now I have been trying to create an access > list to block a quagga router from advertising a ospf learned subnet and for > some reason I cant seem to get this right.... > > so I have router A with a local subnet of 192.168.60.0/24 that is connected > to router B which in turn is connected to router C, I am trying to get router > B to stop advertising 192.168.60.0/24 to router C > > Router B quagga config > > router ospf > redistribute connected route-map RIP_INTF > redistribute rip route-map RIP_INTF > ! > ip prefix-list DROPADDR seq 5 deny 192.168.60.0/24 > ip prefix-list DROPADDR seq 10 permit any > ! > route-map RIP_INTF permit 5 > match ip address prefix-list DROPADDR > ! > > with this in place I still see 192.168.60.0/24 distributed to router C
What makes you think that that route is in OSPF due to redistribution? If it's the subnet that routers A and B are using to speak OSPF to each other, it's going to be in OSPF even if you don't redistribute it from anywhere. /a _______________________________________________ Quagga-users mailing list Quagga-users@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users
