Hi Russell,

I am in Yarm. I've got a yellow 2+2, although it's not been out at all
this year yet but when it's roadworthy I'm often out towards Darlo,
especially the back road from Yarm past Croft :-)

How about you?

Cheers,

Keith

On Jun 10, 9:32 pm, Russell Willcox
<russ...@quantum54.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> Keith,
>     Where do you live? I am in Darlington.
>
> Russell
>
> On 10/06/2012 16:51, Keith Joseph wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear All,
>
> > Many thanks to everyone who has replied to my post - It has been very
> > informative and certainly gives me a lot to think about and to start
> > looking into.
>
> > If I decide to go ahead with the project I shall definitely keep
> > everyone up to speed with my progress (or not as the case may be!)
>
> > Thanks again and if there are any other possible rwd conversions, I
> > would be interested to know.
>
> > On a separate subject, during the 15 years or so that I've been a
> > member of the Quantum Owners club, I've always hoped that a North of
> > England group might be set up but as yet, I don't believe there is
> > one. Does anyone who is in the inner workings of the QOC happen to
> > know the exact number of Quantum owners located within certain
> > regions? If so, I wonder if it would be an idea to contact members in
> > regions which don't have local groups to see if they would be
> > interested in having some regular get together's? At least if I knew
> > there were several others within the Teesside area who were interested
> > in starting a group, we could all get in touch, especially as Croft
> > circuit is within our region :-)
>
> > Thanks again for everyone's help and information.
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Keith
>
> > On Jun 10, 3:40 pm, "Adrian Hopkins"<adrianjhopk...@btinternet.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Jim is correct.
> >> It is the MEV Exocet.
>
> >> I was browsing e-bay earlier today and found this....
>
> >> The attached URL below shows the removal of the body from the MX5 and
> >> fitting in to the space frame 
> >> chassis.http://www.mevowners.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=exo...
>
> >> The guy has it as an unfinihsed project on 
> >> e-bay......http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/MEV-Exocet-kit-car-Part-finished-/330743743...
>
> >> AJ
>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jim Hearne"<j...@quantums.info>
> >> To:<quantumowners@googlegroups.com>
> >> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 12:14 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: Converting a 2+2 into rear wheel drive
>
> >> I believe the MX5 has a complete separate chassis as at this years kit
> >> car show there was a company doing an aerial atom style body conversion
> >> for the MX56 and they pretty much just lifted off the MX5 body and used
> >> the chassis complete.
> >> If it's a suitable size you could maybe use it complete.
> >> But then, why not just by an MX5.............
>
> >> Jim
>
> >> On 09/06/2012 22:40, Eddie wrote:
> >>> Hi Keith
> >>> I think the MX5 rear axel will be very close to fitting on width of
> >>> the 2+2
> >>> One of the advantages is that the axel from the MX5 is fitted into a
> >>> sub frame that will require the floor of the 2+2 to be altered. You
> >>> must watch this area VERY carefully as this area has a box section
> >>> above (between the boot and cabin) that is needed for structural
> >>> rigidity.
> >>> The tunnel down the centre of the car will be relatively easy to
> >>> enlarge to accept a drive shaft, however, the bulkhead is another area
> >>> that will need careful thought as it takes the loads from the frame at
> >>> the front.
> >>> I would recomend altering the shell in composite rather than making
> >>> metal frames to go in the car to accept the rea axel etc as you may
> >>> bolt these frames into areas that are not stressed for the loads that
> >>> will be applied.
> >>> You also need to check this, but I have been advised that the MX5 rear
> >>> axel will take upto 250BHP before needing upgrades. As I say, I have
> >>> been advised of that but I am not sure how accurate this is. Hopefully
> >>> someone here may know more.
> >>> Good luck with this project though. Sounds really good.
> >>> Eddie
> >>> On Jun 9, 2:24 pm, Keith Joseph<ksj.mob...@gmail.com>    wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> I built my 2+2 back in 1998 and am now thinking of a major re-build.
> >>>> Does anyone have any experience or know anyone who has attempted to
> >>>> convert their 2+2 into rear wheel drive?
> >>>> I remember many years ago someone converted theirs into 4wd, I think
> >>>> using an old Fiat Panda but I am after something a bit more sporty as
> >>>> a basis, possibly a Mazda MX5 or something like that.
> >>>> If anyone can offer any advice, I would be most grateful.
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Keith
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "Quantum Owners Group" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> >> For more options, visit this group 
> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
>
> >> IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As 
> >> Is"
> >> basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum
> >> Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or
> >> in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any
> >> person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or
> >> alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained
> >> within this or related message(s).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" 
basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners 
Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the 
preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or 
entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).

Reply via email to