The following JavaScript code takes as input a slider value in the range 0.0 to 1.0 an image height (in pixels) and the image's aspect ratio
It is meant to output a whole number to the CellHeight output and that number multiplied by the aspect ratio at the CellWidth output. Instead, what I get is the correct value at the Width output, but the CellHeight output always shows a zero. This is actually the same issue I was having with the code in my previous post. Can someone tell me if this is a JavaScript patch bug, or if I'm missing something obvious? It seems that it is possible to define multiple named inputs of the same type, but can someone confirm whether or not it is possible to define multiple named outputs in the same way? If not, why not, I wonder? It would seem to be a desirable thing to do.. Cheers, alx http://www.toneburst.net /* JAVASCRIPT PATCH CODE */ // Define function, inputs and outputs function (__number CellWidth, __number CellHeight ) main ( __number CellSizeSlider, __number Height, __number AspectRatio ) { // Initialise output object var result = new Object(); // Reverse slider value cellSize = 1.0 - CellSizeSlider; // Output width as whole-number division of Height cellHeight = Math.floor(cellSize * Height); cellWidth = cellHeight * AspectRatio result.CellWidth = cellWidth; result.CellHeight = cellHeight; // Output values return result; } ___________________________________________________________ Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
