Not that we are aware of. If you find performance problems like this, > please file a bug. > > Bear in mind that there are many factors: CPU, RAM, graphics card, > disk speed, etc. You did not mention how much ram the iMac has, is it > comparable to the 2GB in your macbook pro? The queue patch is very > resource intensive, especially if you are doing it full screen since > the iMac will have many more pixels to save. >
yeah, the imac has also got 2GB of RAM.. and 4mb L2 cache where my mbook only have 2MB. i just compared the gfx-boards and realized that the mboox (radeon X1600 256MB) had twice as much gfx-mem as the imac (radeon hd2400, 128mb). i dont know much about HW at all, maybe this is the big issue here.. however, my friends who tried the patch on their new mbooks (with the crappy intel gfxchipset) reports ~10fps which i find quite strange considering that the radeon hd2400 should be a lot faster than the intel atleast :) Should work just like loading any other font in a cocoa application. I > haven't done it myself but I believe ATS (apple text system) is the > place to look. > ok, im totally new to osx-programming coming from a win32/java background, i'll look into ATS. thanks for the help! -- markus hamburger www.uprough.net
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
