On 22 Dec 2008, at 12:31, Christopher Wright wrote:
Perhaps I start continue the petition to have inspector panels only used for patch-altering controls (i.e. number of input/output ports, etc), instead of things that really should be input controls... not sure if I brought up that idea on the list before. *shrugs*
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: one of the things i really like about QC is the readability and compactness of not having every single possible option as an input. The best of all worlds it seems to me would be a mechanism to selectively expose all the functionality of a patch on a control-by-control basis, ie. the inspector panel would list every possible parameter and with each parameter an option whether it should be a dynamic input to the patch. Sensible defaults would mean casual users wouldn't see any difference, and while facilitating more advanced use with better usability.
[Note to self - file feature request] Toby _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
