Thanks Achim, and to others for their responses.  I now have the 
composition/visualisation working again.  Changing the loop mode on the 
interpolation patches to 'none' did the job.  I am wondering if I should change 
the JavaScript patch while I'm at it though, but I'm not sure how to go about 
this.  This is the only composition I have ever created and it was done a good 
while ago, hence my uncertainty.  I can see that there is a JS patch in the 
Library, but it only has two inputs and one output.  Are you suggesting I use 
this and alter the JS code for my purposes?  If so, I think this may be beyond 
me!

I have further questions about whether there is a way of using the composition 
without iVisualize, but this can wait until the JS issue is sorted.

Thanks again,

Nick

On 3 May 2013, at 15:13, Michael Neuman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Earlier versions of iTunes always published the info, now I think you need to 
> have it open with the visualizer on (cmd-T).  I use a QC visualizer comp with 
> the sprites/ billboards removed. 
> 
> On May 3, 2013, at 6:59 AM, George Toledo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> In some iterations of OS X it has been possible to start iTunes and QC, and 
>> while working on a music visualizer, I receive info from iTunes while it's 
>> running. This may no longer be possible in ML, or may require 32 bit mode.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/nickharambee%40me.com
> 
> This email sent to [email protected]


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to