Do you mean Wayland in AppVMs, dom0, or in both? For AppVMs, I don't care much while X11 is supported.
For dom0, it might be important for hardware support. Regards, Vít Šesták 'v6ak' On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 8:20:33 PM UTC+1, Henry de Valence wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:34:30AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > wrote: > > Since we have some time until 4.1, I think it can be F27. But we have > > plans to implement GUI VM there, which means we will not need X server > > (and the whole desktop environment) in dom0 anymore. We will need them > > in the GUI VM (so, some template). This means switching dom0 > > distribution (even to something different than Fedora) should be much > > simpler. We're not yet sure if we'll do it for 4.1 or later release, but > > this is definitely somewhere on the roadmap. > > What are the current plans for Wayland and Qubes? Fedora is well on their > way > to deprecating X, and the rest of the Linux ecosystem is moving in that > direction too, so it will have to happen at some point. My understanding > is > that the Wayland protocol is much more sane than X and is already much > more > similar to the Qubes GUI protocol than X11 is. Does it make sense to do > that > as part of changing to having a GUI VM? > > Henry > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-devel@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/98138def-c190-4edc-a38d-acf5205ed9df%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
