On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:02:51AM +0000, Rusty Bird wrote: > Peter Todd: > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 06:59:05PM +0100, donoban wrote: > > > On 2/5/21 5:24 PM, Jinoh Kang wrote: > > > > - Switch to reflinks. BTRFS has been around 10+ years, so I assume it's > > > > stable enough? > > > > > > I've been using BTRFS for a few years now and haven't had any problems > > > except some CPU bottleneck using send/receive, but probably you are not > > > interested in that functionality. > > > > I'd like to see btrfs added for its checksums as well. I've personally had > > `btrfs scrub` catch hardware problems before more data got silently > > corrupted. > > It's not the default, but Qubes already supports this since R4.0.1: > > If the Btrfs layout is selected (instead of LVM Thin) during Qubes > installation, a 'file-reflink' storage driver pool will be created > automatically.
I didn't realize this was still an option. Just tried it out on a new install, and looks like it still works. Thanks! -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/20210223072207.ceqnxl5z4rcmwfbp%40petertodd.org.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
