> Yes, Ansible is definitely easier to use. And yes, there is a plan to > add official Ansible support. But I don't have any specific timeline for > that yet (I hope we'll squeeze it into R4.3, but we'll see). > But Salt will also remain there, at least for now.
Ah. So the plan is to gradually migrate to Ansible? In that case, would it make sense to drop my plans to improve SALT and instead focus on testing and setting up states for the new Ansible? If so, it might be worth publicizing the move more widely, because there seems to be a vague understanding among community developers that SALT is the "proper" way to do things. E.g. Arkenoi's Liteqube fork states translating everything to SALT as a pre-1.0 goal. https://github.com/arkenoi/liteqube I'm sure I'm not the only dev out there who's been getting frustrated playing around with SALT and would be more than willing to test Ansible. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/878qnx3gfa.fsf%40zazbrown.com.
