-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 06.08.2016 04:47, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> Well, it should only be unnerving if you know with certainty that GnuPG is > returning different results on the *exact same* sequence of bits. Since > you didn't hash the ISO before the first (failed) verification attempt, we > don't have any evidence that that's the case. It's much more likely that > the bits changed (e.g., due to write caching, as you suggested). Bad memory or bit flips in memory might be a second plausible cause to look at. Maybe you can check that (bad memory) with memtest86+? - -- Live long and prosper Robin `ypid` Schneider -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXpZ+eAAoJEIb9mAu/GkD4X8oQANZ9cGCScw2W8JSsI2yvSmWD H0SIrIz4QtamITtQhwpOVJT40hnMnoiilTfiR2OeOW9iKE7MbABYV3diyiYJh5Yg XhkiEi3d4LoK0Kxn1Zn/9MI+DHTN+yKlWj5V0GH9V7x8mdSewksUD5P63Zsses+f 7s2Ant5cfUdnV12ysayXmzq5YlYG4C0vJptP8aMqbVW8wFytKZFczzM31sGPaRWw 7DJShhP4jILLbqtqL+v0Lmgkl4fjW8Z2wTUqeJJ9F0EmQdHm5ANDyVXb1m+od0vT jK+wdoPDlgljHz4bkFiXHjMvrLggFXjboR54/2UcglhYgDcwggrAmmOKEzC1c7mK wV0BtdIrv1+PWPOqxv5Xb3rOKZb3lbiNcHp3Upz/NaMTGmqn+vT50rg8f0kLxara QUW1YlArN0Lp7csO22Gpnj7rQfIubjzwhNpdAh26gSUXkfKbGvkjOTr5MctR73sE JG50NXGWCQpBj1Q0cAzuXhCGDW3YhGMl9OgPOos6ZG+BMVPw+Qxf85VgIxUcCfJb 2pBSWfShcPmBsZ1FzrFvVWE2O9StwpaKheezVYbLNxjcta2QL32AY0Wp3cXsYxGU W7kisX0+HTH2xijdY4R60W2uXtNlXZCXPiqwu58Uleo7h5/qXaDWx06r0s5mf9QW lnskN719dtd4jFwi3Rv3 =udik -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/d513833b-e1e9-8746-021d-e20f867b85f3%40riseup.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
