Am 17.03.2017 um 01:19 schrieb Franz:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:01 AM, evo <evolut...@aliaks.de
> <mailto:evolut...@aliaks.de>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     Am 15.03.2017 um 23:45 schrieb Andrew David Wong:
>     > On 2017-03-15 01:14, evo wrote:
>     >> Am 15.03.2017 um 01:17 schrieb Unman:
>     >>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:02:58PM -0400, Chris Laprise wrote:
>     >>>> On 03/14/2017 01:55 PM, evo wrote:
>     >>>>> hmm.. this is also a good point, thanks! so if i do not use
>     >>>>> openoffice in my bankingVM, there is no practical
>     >>>>> vulnerability in it.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Yes and no. Off the top of my head, there are two things to be
>     >>>>  concerned about with the (regular, distro) software you
>     >>>> install:
>     >>>>
>     >>>> 1. Does it cause an additional service to start accepting
>     >>>> connections?
>     >>>>
>     >>>> 2. Does it have a MIMEtype or similar mapping, so that clicking
>     >>>> on a mislabeled file could cause it to open in an
>     >>>> unwanted/risky app. Unfortunately, nautilus doesn't seem to
>     >>>> have a setting for always asking before starting an app. But
>     >>>> at least it defaults to double-click instead of single-click.
>     >>>>
>     >>>
>     >>> 3. Installing some programs, like libre/openoffice, brings with
>     >>> it numerous libraries and attendant programs which may widen the
>     >>>  attack surface of your qube considerably.
>     >>>
>     >
>     >> so its better to have such VMs as banking or email in
>     >> standalone-mode.
>     >
>     > No, that doesn't follow. See my previous message about having multiple
>     > TemplateVMs.
>     >
>     >> The thing is... as i understood, stanalone-machines (if they are
>     >> not HVM) have all software from the template they use. So the only
>     >> way is, to install new iso on HVM, isn't it?
>     >
>     >
>     > This doesn't follow either. StandaloneVMs and HVMs are completely
>     > independent of one another. It's possible that there is terminological
>     > confusion here. Please consult the glossary:
>     >
>     > https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/glossary/
>     <https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/glossary/>
>     >
>     >> in that case, i don't really understand the sense of standalone
>     >> AppVMs.
>     >
>     >
>     > StandaloneVMs can be useful for many different things, but not every
>     > user will have a need for them. For example, if you have a piece of
>     > software that installs parts of itself in both the root fs and
>     user dirs
>     > (and you don't want to work around this with bind-dirs), and you need
>     > the software in only one VM, then a StandaloneVM is probably a perfect
>     > solution.
>     >
>     >
> 
> Evo, let me oversimplify it
> 
>     so is it better to have more template-VMs?
> 
> 
> yes
> 
>     But why not standalone as a copy of the existing template-VM?
> 
> 
> you do not need standalone VMs. StandaloneVMs are only for special
> cases/software, but since you do not mention any special case forget
> them as well as HVMs.
>  
> 
>     After that i can delete all software i dont need on it and have rather
>     clean VM with just the software i need.
> 
> 
> you can do the same with templates
> 
> 
>     the other thing is, on standalone-vm i can see existing updates just in
>     time... VM that works on general template dont show updates, for this
>     case i must start the template vm. So if i do not start template for a
>     long time, i will have insecure appvms. Or do i understand something
>     wrong?
> 
> 
> Evo, just start the templates every time Qubes-manager show than an
> update is available, with the green downward arrow, that is every few
> days. Then reboot your computer. Updating only a couple of templates
> you'll automatically update and somehow clean all of yours VMs, that in
> my case are 38. You'll probably have only a few of them, but with time
> you'll learn how convenient it is to create template depending light VMs
> for special purposes. But imagine having a lot of standaloneVMs each one
> needing an independent update.
> best
> Fran
> 

hmmm, ok
you won :)

i just thought, its crude to create 3 different template-VMs for vault,
e-mail and banking.

after using Qubes for some time, i understand the possibility to have 38 VMs

so the appVM (based on template) will show me also the green arrow of
update? i thought, it is just visible, if you start the template-VM.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/5afe8005-5f22-c28e-d56e-6abd5667153b%40aliaks.de.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to