On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 09:32:03PM +0000, lik...@gmx.de wrote: > On 3/30/19 2:56 AM, unman wrote: > > > In the first case you are creating a disposableVM, based on a a DVM > > Template, fedora-28-dvm > > In the second case you are creating a DVM Template, which will be used > > as the basis for disposableVMs. > > > > That is the difference, and it's why you cant resize the named dvm - the > > named dvm takes its properties from the underlying DVM Template. > > > > unman > > > > Thanks for the clarification, unman! :) > > What's the reason that for creating a dvm, we have to go the way: template -> > AppVm (dvm-template) -> dvm > Why is it conceptionally not possible to create a dvm directly from a > template: template -> dvm?
This used to be the norm, but as part of the move to multiple disposableVMs that path has gone. Now a DVM Template has to be an appVM. Does it have to be like this? I suppose not, but what is the issue? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/20190331141452.jlb2ueitclqtpa33%40thirdeyesecurity.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
