> > To correct a misunderstanding... I'm not a member of the Qubes project. > I'm listed on the Qubes page as a contributor, e.g. contributing to the > project from the outside
When I said 'team' I meant something more along the lines of 'recognized contributor' than 'member', but it's my fault for wording it so vaguely. Either way, it significantly decreases the riskiness of the hardening package in my eyes. There was an effort like that years ago. The doc is here and you can > still suggest edits: > https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/security-guidelines/ > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.qubes-os.org%2Fdoc%2Fsecurity-guidelines%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGk4Cjg3fVEz1_lDwx8gcqigzHpmg> I meant including information on Fedora versus Debian security, the re-activation of AppArmor (or at least a bigger sign pointing to its deactivation), the existence of your hardening project, etc. I've read every single document and don't recall seeing any of those. Anyway, I'll suggest edits later using some of what you've included here and elsewhere, which will be attributed to you, if you're fine with that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/1a10a220-8889-4228-b4cd-6f4b50d41831%40googlegroups.com.
