Brian Utterback wrote:
> Danny Mayer wrote:
> 
>> David Schwartz wrote:
>>
>>> "Danny Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> No it is not a flaw in the protocol design. It would be if it were put
>>>> in. The address doesn't belong there, it belongs in the IP header which
>>>> the receiving server always gets.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    It is a flaw. Its absence requires the receiver to assume that the
>>> origin address of the UDP packet received is the IP address of the
>>> sending server. This assumption may or may not be correct. But if the
>>> address were in there, the assumption would not be needed.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Absolutely not. That would be a layering violation. Verification is done
>> through key exchange and the MAC section in the NTP packet.
> 
> 
> If that is a layering violation, then why do you need to know both the
> source and destination address of each NTP packet to authenticate it?
> 

I refer you to the autokey protocol.

Danny



_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to