Harlan Stenn wrote: > As for the refid, please see: > > http://ntp.isc.org/bin/view/Dev/UpdatingTheRefidFormat > > and my comment on 01 Nov 2004 and my last comment dated 17 Jun 2005. > > The current refid is apparently sufficient for its intended purpose. > > The issue seems to be "we now have greater needs and how do we best solve > them?" >
What exactly is this "greater need"? If you don't spell it out how can we know what you are talking about? If there is a greater need why is it not being discussed in the NTP WG? Danny _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
