"Ulisses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Roman Mäder wrote:
>> thanks to all who responded. It wasn't the pps signal that had the 200ms
>> offset, but the NMEA-derived time itself. It looks like some hiccup,
>> because after another hard reset (pulling the plug) the unit is back to
>> normal operation.
>
> ummm... this makes me remember what happens with Garmin HVS-35:
>
> NMEA messages had an offset of [400, 700] ms with respect to the pps
> pulse!
>
> I tested this in different units with an osciloscope.
>
> I asked Garmin and they told me that it was spected ¿?
You should *not* use the NMEA messages for a timestamp unless the GPS
unit provides some guaranteed relationship between those messages and the
UTC secound boundary.
DS
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
