Eugen COCA wrote: > You are right. But ... starting from RFCs is just like reinventing the > wheel. I would better need a schematic with a microcontroller (PIC or > Atmel) and the programs in assembler. I'm not a beginner but I don't > have enough time to play. I prefer using SNTP because I need to check > the 123 port as an ordinary client. There is a tcp/ip stack > implemented on PIC16f877 and 452 micocontrollers and I think there > are some fans who develloped such a gadget already.
It helps to mention the controller you are using. On Goggle: "PIC16f877 NTP" (without the quotes) produces 91 hits, including: http://ssro.ee.uec.ac.jp/elecon/elec0101/spec.pdf which has the title NTP Clock. It is in Japanese, though. David _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
