David J Taylor wrote: > I didn't know about the difference between the SMP and uniprocessor HAL - > most interesting! On this system the performance counter is 3.579... MHz > (US colour TV!), as it is on the backup PC. Both are uniprocessor > systems.
Yes, that's the clock rate of the timer chip which is used in the uniprocessor HAL. If the SMP HAL is used then the performance counter frequency matches the CPU clock. > I wish I knew what I had changed, but I don't! However, from my own tests > the change will benefit all those systems no on XP SP2, so any SP1 systems > still out there, plus all the Windows 2000 and (perhaps) the Windows NT > systems. Yep. Martin -- Martin Burnicki Meinberg Funkuhren Bad Pyrmont Germany _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
