On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:41:10 GMT, Tom Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tapio Sokura wrote: >> Raphae wrote: >> >>> when running the command >>> >>> # ntptrace pool.ntp.org >>> >>> >>> more than half of the servers in the pool seem to be dead. Isn't >> >> >> Are you sure that they are dead, or just not responding to NTP control >> mode (mode 6) packets? Because mode 6 is what ntptrace uses, when the >> actual NTP time queries are sent/received using modes 1-5. All pool >> servers that I just tried did answer to normal time queries (mode 3) >> just fine. Some server operators choose to restrict mode 6 queries, that >> is completely acceptable by the pool rules. >> >> Tapio > >Yes. "ntpdate -q [server]" is a better test. Here is the result of my running that command: $ ntpdate -q pool.ntp.org server 130.236.254.106, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 194.146.227.112, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 66.17.252.26, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 66.187.233.4, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 64.172.230.138, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 85.130.119.198, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 131.211.80.155, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 195.197.87.213, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 207.145.113.114, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 213.240.180.155, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 217.71.122.144, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 server 217.125.14.244, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 13 Dec 14:19:30 ntpdate[5334]: no server suitable for synchronization found I am in Silicon Valley, California. I would assume that there are some suitable servers in my immediate vicinity. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
