Serge Bets wrote: > Hello Danny, > > On Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 14:02:22 +0000, Danny Mayer wrote: > > >>Steve Kostecke wrote: >> >>>I do not disbelieve your claim that _you_ need to use a client >>>sym-link (or whatever the equivalent is on your OS) to activate >>>Identity Schemes. >> >>I disbelieve this claim as it is not OS specific (modulo Windows). > > > I don't understand what you mean: My claim is indeed not OS specific.
I didn't say it was. My reference to Windows relates to the difficulties of dealing with Unix-specific usages like symlinks. > Initially I reported it on Win client, because the problem happened me > there. I never said it was Win specific, but of course it had to be > investigated. Later checks seem to indicate a general and recent > problem. Only Steve accused Windows, without serious justification. > Steve had nothing to say about Windows. He doesn't have the knowledge. I was the one who mentioned it. > >>Serge's setup has a problem when is causing him to work around this by >>using a client sym-link. > > > Do you have any suggestion about why IFF would succeed with a client > symlink, and TC would succeed without? Outside of the 20051002 change? > IFF works fine without a client symlink. > >>Those pages [ConfiguringAutokey] are correct. We are running these >>schemes all over UDel as well as a number of other places. > > > With both latest ntp-dev and strict client setup? > I have no idea what a strict client setup is. The campus flock all run with the latest ntp-dev code. Danny > > Serge. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
