Dave, David> I'm uneasy calling random() for every read of the clock, as David> it could be expensive.
We could fairly easily fuzz 1 out of every N calls or fuzz a random percentage of calls (we could use the value of ntp_random() for this purpose as well as for the fuzz). David> It seems a bit overkill to fuzz the nanobits David> when the caller has timespec and fuzzed to 10 ms. Perhaps a test of David> precision greater than a microsecond is advised. That's what my patch would do - we could easily adjust the threshhold, or even offer a tinker interface. Want me to code it up? H _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
