On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 06:29:14 +0000, David J Taylor wrote: > .. although only if you use one particular, rather illogical, day > numbering convention where the significance order is mixed up throughout > the date string. Using a more logical convention, where significance > increases uniformly, you still have a month to go.
60/61, 60, 60, 24, 28/30/31, 365/366: real uniform there :-D I'll take ISO 8601 as the one, true date format, please. I don't claim its uniform, just unambiguous. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
