Dave, thank you for your explanation - a significant temporary frequency error at the server or client. Hope the server - other peers have small or nearly none asymmetry and almost all of their delays are not far from their blunt noses - a mirrors of my own offset scatter. The second plot was only enlarged part of the first one. Yes, I will try the huffpuff filter to see how it works. -- Karel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Karel, > > Your first scattergram shows a tail extending downward to the left. That > happens when there is a significant freqency error at the server or client > and generally damps out once the critters have stabilized. In the first > and second scattergrams there is evidence of a 30-ms delay in both > directions at least some of the time. The darker upper limb of both grams > show a highly unsymmetric traffic. Fix that with the huffpuff option. The > blunt nose in both grams is due to jitter. > > Dave > > Karel Sandler wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> to better know the network quality between my S2 and its peers, the wedge >> scattergrams were used. That strange one has the upper limb prolonged >> down to the left side of the head. Only few samples (status 9314) are >> located there but their existence is beyond all my understanding. >> Hope my S2 works well, only one plot (one peer from seven) shows up that >> feature - lx.ujf.cas.cz/ntp-lx/antitail.png . >> -- >> K. Sandler > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
