David Woolley wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Richard B. Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>"sunblok" and "sunburn" are two servers on my local network. On >>"sunblok" I can say "peer sunburn" and on "sunburn" I can say "peer >>sunblok". It works! > > > I believe this constitutes symmetric active, when Dave Mills is > talking about symmetric passive, where only one side actually > has the association configured.
Is "symmetric passive" different from just saying, in ntp.conf: "server sunblok iburst"? For the record, that works without problems too! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
