Dave, Yes, the clients should definitely have been configured with server statements, but config files were simply copied in this case, cleanup is imminent. My point was to illustrate that with "restrict default nopeer" and "disable auth" configured on the server, there is a difference in behavior between a built-from-source 4.2.2p3 daemon and these (questionable heritage) prebuilt 4.2.0 daemons (CSW and Mandrake).
Bill David L. Mills wrote: > Bill, > > In your network the clients should be using server, not peer, unless > they intend to mobilize a symmetric association. However, without > notrust they get served anyway, but an association is not mobilized. I > did that for the original Windows XP client that was using symmetric > active mode in error. It's hard to figure out how the dominos should > fall under all kinds of misconfigured clients. > > Dave _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
