[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Woolley) writes: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > David J Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Almost certainly what happened is that the random selection of servers > selected one that particularly disliked unauthorised accesses on port 37 > and deliberately served an incorrect time to such clients to try and > dissuade them. Subsequently it selected a server that wasn't so aggressive > in defending itself against port 37 attacks.
What makes you choose to call it an attack? Regards Jon _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
