Steve Kostecke wrote: > On 2007-02-03, Uwe Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>David Woolley wrote: >> >>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>> >>>Make sure that you aren't really running ntpd as some vendors have >>>a weird idea that misnaming ntpd confuses people less; it certainly >> >>This happened by way of LSB (http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/LSB) >>Linux Standard Base requirements which mandated a package of name >>"*xntp*" is installed in contrast to older software by name of "*ntp*". > > > Please provide a link to the LSB requirements which mandate this name > change. If you can't you're spreading mis-information. I am no priest, thus i can't spread misinformation, only what i remember of that item.
the LSB 1.2 mentions xntp, i could not find the LSB files that enumerate required packages. at the time of release of SuSE 7.? ( can't remember ) this was explicitly stated by the release team in the accompanying README. I would have to do real archeology to unearth my media of that time. uwe _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
