Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Better to make both symmetric-active: > > > ntpdc -c 'addpeer B.B.B.B' A.A.A.A > > ntpdc -c 'addpeer A.A.A.A' B.B.B.B > > I though the point of "addpeer" was that a single association could > transfer time in any direction (and I still have trouble reading > the documentation any other way). If I need to make two associations, > then why not just do > > ntpdc -c 'addserver B.B.B.B' A.A.A.A > ntpcd -c 'addserver A.A.A.A' B.B.B.B > > i.e. what is the difference between a client connection and a peer > connection if both are unidirectional?
I've nothing to add to Dave Mills' answer; I don't know what real difference there is, but at least it makes it obvious what you expect to happen, and both ends are clear about the relationship. Side comment: why are you doing all the config via ntpdc rather than putting it into the ntp.conf file? -- Ronan Flood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
