Harlan Stenn wrote: > Spoon wrote: > >> Harlan Stenn wrote: >> >>> And have you read about the problems you can cause by having HZ at a >>> value other than 100? Particularly with Linux kernels? >> >> No. Where is that? > > I just looked and I thought I saw somebody post something about this here, > although it might have been on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just looked, and I could > not > find it. > > It was a discussion about how one had to be careful to make sure that the HZ > value was "properly" divisible, and also not so fast that interrupts were > lost.
Are you referring to this discussion? http://lists.ntp.isc.org/pipermail/questions/2006-October/thread.html#11766 > Have you just tried this yet? I didn't have time to yet :-( I had randomly thought it might be a good idea to crank HZ up to 250. Are you saying ntpd will break if I set HZ to 250 in Linux 2.6? Regards. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
