[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) writes: > Thomas Tornblom wrote: > If I understand correctly what you are asking what we need here instead > of the server line, we should have a pool line and and an exclude line > to ignore any specific IP addresses that we don't want to use. I'm > suggesting that the exclude line can be used separately since you don't > want them anywhere used. So for example you would want to do something > like this: > > exclude 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.0 > exclude 5.6.7.8 > pool se.europe.pool.ntp.org max 5 >
No, what I'm asking for is that anyone that is participating the pool initiative should be required to accept connections from any reasonable client, and specifically not be allowed to filter out traffic from a large ISP just because they acted as asses 20 years ago. Having an "exclude" option is a band-aid solution to this problem. > (pool is coming, exclude I just made up for this message). > The exclude lines would exclude all IP addresses in 1.2.3.* and 5.6.7.8. > This is different from a restrict line since it would automatically not > allow those addresses to be used as servers and peers. > > If this is what fits the bill, please enter a bug item in bugzilla with > these details. > > Thanks, > Danny > > _______________________________________________ > questions mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
