>Last time when I looked at it, it had no support for kernel PPS
>("hardpps()"). That's what I also had a long time before. I haven't checked
>recently.I've never understood this area. Why do I want a hardpps in the kernel? What I want in the kernel is support to capture the information accurately. That means something like reading the time when the PPS signal into the serial driver generates an interrupt. I don't see any rush to process that data. The ATOM/PPS driver, for example, processes a batch of 64 samples at a time. So as long as the driver can read the data out of the kernel before it gets overwritten, that's good enough. Maybe in the old days ntpd couldn't get enough CPU cycles on busy machines. Is that a serious problem today? -- These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
