> I can understand that, and I do not advocate that any different > frequency be distributed.
So you are wanting *another* time scale for frequency applications? After all, Hz is just cycles per second (in your world I wouldn't know which second it would be). Wanting to redefine how many oscillations there are in everything for a *new second* is not practical by any stretch of the imagination. > I understand this. What I have tried to do - and I realize that my > proposed scheme may be a bit too baroque and complicated to be > seriously considered - is to provide a scheme that minimizes the > unhappiness. Seriously considered? The more I read it, the more I think it is just a bad joke taken too far. Instead of being happy with just adding a leap second every now and then, you want to screw with and break every time scale possible and every piece of electronic equipment on earth. We might as well just go back to the stone age and use sun dials. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
