Dave, Looking at the ntp_config code, it looks like he did indeed change the code for a pool config line but I don't know yet what he did to use the resultant data. I will have to spend time tracking that down. This may work for the pool only. I have a larger agenda. I'm also not clear why he has a call to get_multiple_netnums() as well as getnetnum() since the both will retrieve all addresses and I don't want to throw away any of the addresses. I will need to test this. From the look of it it will just set up multiple addresses from the pool. There are also a number of bugs that need to get fixed in this code.
Danny David L. Mills wrote: > Danny, > > Maybe I'm dreaming awake, but I have a distinct memory that at least one > DNS reply did have multiple addresses, but that the order was randomized > on every reply. I was told that the NTP code used only the first one. A > quick check in ntp_config.c shows a pool argument to the server command, > but I haven't checked further to see what it does. The code is very > mangled and with few comments. > > Dave _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
